Art and Wine Have a Long History. But Does Art Sell Wine?

Increasingly, a bottle of wine these days seems to arrive with an artist attached; on a label, via a vineyard commission, through social media scrolls. The rationale for these arty collaborations is by now well-rehearsed: to attract new audiences, differentiate a brand, and increase cultural capital.

“Art enables us to connect with a cultured audience, and is also a good way to keep your brand alive,” says Fabien Vallérian, the international director of arts and culture at Ruinart, which has ostensibly been at it since 1896, when Alphonse Mucha, an Art Nouveau artist, designed the first ad for the Maison. Against shifting drinking habits and crowded shelf space, linking wine to art can signal higher value, create buzz, and lend innovation credentials to a brand.

The question is whether it works for the everyday wine brands themselves, whether it serves smaller scale producers running on tight margins, and whether audiences who pay for art and cultural access in other contexts value wine the same way.

The empirical basis is thin. Research into arts sponsorship finds plenty of potential for goodwill and engagement (who doesn’t like the thrill of opening the post-launch party goodie bag in the cab home?), but less evidence of what happens at the till. Consumer studies can show an “art infusion” effect, in which visual art can raise perceived value and luxury associations, while eye-tracking studies of wine labels have found pictorial elements attract the most attention, and label attractiveness predicts willingness to pay. But the effect varies by artwork, product, and consumer, and brands themselves rarely publish controlled sales data capable of proving a return.

Impecunious arts organizations expect product donations from wine brands, which suggests a shaky grasp of the latter’s balance sheet. Wine is capital-intensive business with tight, often impossible margins, few brands can afford to bankroll another “collab” and hope some cultural capital sticks, so it’s worth separating the various forms the wine-art relationship takes in the market today, and asking what each is actually for.

The Prestige Exception: When the Bottle Becomes the Object

The art-plus-wine model has been propelled by blue-chip Champagne brands over the past three decades, where the boundary between wine and art object blurs. Since the 2006 vintage, Louis Roederer has collaborated with French designer Philippe Starck on its zero-dosage Brut Nature, a project Starck accepted only once he could have input into the cuvée itself. Dom Pérignon‘s collaborations with world-renowned and commercially successful artists include Jeff Koons’ 2013 Balloon Venus, built around Rose Vintage 2003; labels for Vintage 2015 using Jean-Michel Basquiat’s “In Italian” (Basquiat died in 1988); and Takashi Murakami’s designs for Vintage 2015 and the first Rosé Vintage 2010. Veuve Clicquot handed the design of La Grande Dame 2012 to Yayoi Kusama.

Such limited editions, launches, and their relaunches keep these brands in conversation and turn the wine and especially its packaging into sought-after objects for collectors more than drinkers — Kusama’s numbered sculpture 71/100, complete with a bottle of La Grande Dame 2012, sold at auction for £87,720 in January. But prestige editions reveal little about whether art sells ordinary wine in ordinary quantities.

Back in the still wine aisles, rarely does a season pass without a wine “doing art,” partnering at a gallery launch, or doing a restaurant activation tie-in. There are charitable one-offs, a separate economy from selling wine: in 2013 a nine-litre Salmanazar of Ornellaia 2010, customized by Michelangelo Pistoletto, sold for £80,000 at Sotheby’s, then the highest price paid at auction for a single bottle of Italian wine.

“The wine was first and the fact of doing things differently than things had been done before was first. And then art came to partner on this adventure.”

At the everyday end, Campo Viejo has put street artists including Okuda San Miguel and Remed on supermarket-priced Riojas, with Pernod Ricard citing distinctive packaging among drivers of growth to a record three million cases annually by 2020; Prophecy Wines built its core range around Victo Ngai’s tarot-like illustrations; while Ecco Domani, Santero, and even Aldi have used artist or designer labels to distinguish their bottles.

The Label: What It Can and Cannot Do

The artist label is the most established form of partnership. It is most convincing when a genuine bond joins winery and artist, a shared philosophy legible in both bottle and image. Without it, the strategy reads as a marketing ploy rather than a statement and loses both audiences at once. Its lineage traces to Château Mouton Rothschild, where in 1924 Baron Philippe commissioned Jean Carlu, a graphic designer, to reinterpret the family crest for his first vintage label. The gesture celebrated the mise en bouteille au château milestone, as much as aesthetics, a signal of radical innovation in the industry, like an avant-garde manifesto.

“The wine was first and the fact of doing things differently than things had been done before was first. And then art came to partner on this adventure,” says Julien de Beaumarchais de Rothschild, co-owner of Château Mouton Rothschild, who oversees the estate’s relationship with artists. The labels have become a roll-call of the most commercially significant 20th-century artists since Braque created the label for the 1955 vintage. Dalí followed in 1958, Picasso’s estate for the 1973 release (posthumously to mark promotion to first growth), Warhol designed 1975 vintage label; canonical now, but each in their own time matched the estate’s spirit of disruption and innovation.

Here is the inconvenient finding. Across 52 post-reveal reviews covering the past 12 vintages of Chateau Mouton’s grand vin, only seven named the artist, two described the artwork and none incorporated it into the wine’s score or qualitative judgement. This might suggest the trade and wine nerds treat the artist as paratext, just promotional material outside the serious evaluation of the wine. That approach misses what an Olafur Eliasson (2019) or an Anish Kapoor (2009) is signalling on a Mouton artist label: a form of translation, giving voice to a year or a region, making visible the most immaterial things a wine can hold: transmitting terroir.

This is why the label works hardest when producer and artist share a cause. In 2009, South Africa’s revered winemaker, Eben Sadie, made six wines from old vines, released as a series of 280 boxed sets, with ink-wash drawings and collages inspired by their West Coast vineyards drawn by its most important artist, William Kentridge, a known oenophile. “It wasn’t about business — at no point money was exchanged,” Sadie says. “It was about putting something out there to say, here’s part of our history in wine,” a history in wine and art that had been once overlooked by both wine and art markets.

At the other end sit intimate stories, almost inside jokes between wineries and artists captured on a label design. Leeuwin Estate’s Art Series has featured Australian artists since its first vintage in 1980, with each label carrying its own anecdote — from a better deal on a John Kelly than the National Gallery managed, to keeping all four of John Olsen’s frog drawings for its Riesling, to co-founder Tricia Horgan continuing to scout artists for the collection (“I’ve got my eye on you,” she tells them). Gut Oggau’s bottles each carry the face of an invented family member drawn by Jung von Matt, ageing a little with every vintage. Cult wines such as Montevertine’s Le Pergole Torte continue to feature vintage labels illustrated with the elegant mystery women drawn by Alberto Manfredi, even after his passing.

The Estate As Gallery

A different kind of partnership forms through oenotourism, with sculpture parks and gallery spaces drawing visitors to the other side of the bottle. Italy is exemplary: around 60 wine-producing sites exist, according to the University of Verona. These are heirs to a tradition of placing contemporary art in rural spaces that runs back to the 1960s. The Ceretto estate in Piedmont reports its Sol LeWitt and David Tremlett designed Barolo Chapel draws at least 30,000 visitors a year, and at least another 10,000 visiting the winery. From Ca’ del Bosco, to Castello di Ama, to Feudi di San Gregorio, to Vini Planeta, tastings unfold among commissions and collections.

Here, art plausibly does sell wine through the captive audience and experiential pleasure of drinking wine where it is made. But the more compelling examples involve skin in the game: owners committing personal capital, land, and years to cultural projects that become part of the foundation rather than an annual marketing line. Places like Bodega Colomé where Donald Hess planted a museum devoted to James Turrell 2,300 metres up in the Andes. Or David Walsh blasting and burrowing his subterranean Museum of Old and New Art (MONA) three levels into the sandstone beneath Moorilla’s historic Pinot Noir vineyard on Hobart’s Berriedale Peninsula in Tasmania. The commercial logic of bringing people physically onto a wine estate is clearer more generally. Wine Australia found 66.7 percent of cellar-door visitors bought wine during their visit, averaging 4.42 bottles, while follow-up research found a 16 percent net gain in buyers among those who’d never previously bought a brand.

“We believe artists are the best ambassadors to raise awareness about ecology. You’re not just there to drink Champagne, you’re also there to think about protecting the planet.”

Château La Coste in Provence is an exemplary case: since it opened in 2011, art has been continuously integrated into the landscape, with sculptures and pavilions by Tadao Ando, Frank Gehry, and Tracey Emin making the domain a cultural destination in its own right. Official tourism figures recorded 200,000 visitors in 2017, rising to a reported 400,000 annually in 2024. The estate’s development director, Jérôme Scheher, says 25 percent of its 700,000 bottles are sold directly onsite.

Owner Paddy McKillen’s friendships with the architects and artists make the results organic. In June, the estate released Madame ‘B’, a rosé from the 2025 vintage, in an inaugural run of 10,000 bottles carrying a butterfly design by Damien Hirst continuing a long-standing friendship between the pair and of Hirst’s 2024 estate-wide exhibition, “The Light That Shines.” “The château is a place we both love and from which we draw inspiration,” McKillen says. The continuing build-out, including a wine school and more cellar space, puts the cultural project into the winery’s long-term development rather than an annual activation budget.

You Are Cordially Invited: The Art x Wine Event

Commissions and sponsorship can tie a wine to a cultural moment, borrowing audiences and associations that conventional advertising struggles to reach. England’s burgeoning wine industry is a revealing case. In its 2025 Industry Report, WineGB has sales up 200 percent between 2018 and 2024, reaching 9.1 million bottles, while producers have become increasingly culturally acquisitive. Artelium Wine Estate commissions artists across labels and exhibitions; Balfour Winery commissioned artists to interpret its limited Winemakers’ Collection; Nyetimber is taking the Ruinart route, attaching English sparkling wine to sponsorship of cultural institutions from the National Gallery to the V&A and Design Museum. Vines take years to mature; cultural capital can be acquired rather faster. Getting the art world to drink your wine for free is one thing; getting it to pay for the next bottle is another.

Since 2018 the historic Veronese producer Pasqua has invested nearly €6 million in contemporary art encompassing labels, immersive installations, exhibitions, and programs. CEO Riccardo Pasqua says the aim is to reach consumers through “entertainment, beauty, and lifestyle”, opening the winery to spaces once considered “unorthodox.” Its ‘Artistic Projects’ open call this year drew over 200 applications, and selected Sara Ricciardi whose installation appeared at Palazzo Maffei during Vinitaly. Here, the investment is substantial and sustained; the puzzle is still measurement. Exposure, attendance, and engagement can be counted, isolating the arts’s effect on sales is harder. A delighted opening-night audience delighted at the opening is not yet a customer at the till.

The buzz generated by continuous events can also hide the better work. Ruinart excels at presence at the fairs and biennales, the art world guzzling its blanc de blancs, but the glamor obscures a serious arts commissioning program running since 2008, asking artists such as Vik Muniz and David Shrigley to answer questions on climate change, sustainability, and nature, now extended to a younger roster of commissioned artists and designers. “We believe artists are the best ambassadors to raise awareness about ecology,” says Frédéric Dufour, president of Maison Ruinart. As if on cue, the American artist Andrea Bowers, a participant in this Conversations with Nature commission, adds: “You’re not just there to drink Champagne, you’re also there to think about protecting the planet.”

The Verdict: Attention Is Not a Sale

It is a crowded moment for collaborations between almost everything and the art world, and a brand that places an artwork on a bottle and calls the result “art” enters an increasingly skeptical field. The evidence suggests that art can influence how consumers see wine: attracting attention, raising perceived value, making a bottle memorable, and in the right setting, encouraging purchase or visit. What remains harder to prove is whether the artwork itself produces sustained incremental sales rather than a temporary lift in attention or footfall.

That makes the nature of the partnership matter. The strongest partnerships require patience, capital, and commitment beyond an annual campaign; the credible ones feel almost accidental, incidental to what the winery was doing anyway. Mouton’s labels grew from commitment to innovation; La Coste’s commissions from friendship and sustained project pipeline; Ruinart’s core arts engagement from years of investment in a theme. Independent producers, struggling with the usual pressures at the best of times, rarely have that luxury.

As collaborations multiply, consumers have also become more practiced at reading them. Once the museum or gallery moves onto the small space of a label, into an event or across an estate, the artwork and cultural claim are judged alongside the wine. Art can change what a consumer notices and remembers. Whether it changes what they buy depends on more than putting an artist’s name on the bottle.

The article Art and Wine Have a Long History. But Does Art Sell Wine? appeared first on VinePair.